Saturday, June 14, 2008

Flash in the pan - rich media use in government

My agency, due to various factors outside direct control, has long had a reluctance to consider the use of Adobe Flash (previously Macromedia Flash) in our intranet or websites.

I can understand this - there are network and security considerations that need resolution, and Flash has only been around since 1996 (well OK I don't consider that a good reason - even government uses desktop applications and operating systems less than 12 years old).

Also Flash as a rich media application is, well, flashy. It is often overused or used incorrectly and requires skills that not all web designers or developers possess.

There are also a number of myths about Flash which cloud the issue.

Having used Flash and Adobe Director (formerly Macromedia Director) since 1996 in several hundred multimedia and web projects, I've had many experiences - mostly good but also some bad with the product.

Here's some of the lessons I have learnt - and myths busted.

Think visual not verbal
Web is still primarily a text medium, in that messages are largely conveyed via text on the screen. Also more web people seem to come out of print media than visual media. The text mindset is not appropriate for Flash and similar rich medias, which are primarily visual.

Therefore it is important to think visually, using techniques such as storyboarding rather than scripting and deliver 90% of the message via visuals and short takes rather than long written descriptions.

Use Flash sparingly - keep the purpose in mind
Flash is best used to create an effect or convey a visual message. Therefore my view is that when you need to provide navigation or blocks of content it is better to use HTML rather than Flash.

There's several reasons supporting this.

  • Flash is optimal for visual not text delivery
  • Flash tends to be more expensive to develop and maintain than HTML
  • Flash has a longer development cycle, making it slower to update Flash websites than HTML ones - note that there are ways to separate the content from the presentation layer to make content updates easy, however changing the look still requires dedicated time
  • Flash is not accepted in all environments. What happens if your customers block Flash via their firewalls? (I've encountered this direct situation in my agency - at one point we could not see the website of one of the advertising agencies pitching to us as their website was entirely constructed in Flash)
  • Flash can be less accessible to people using screen readers - note the can. It is possible to make Flash accessible, but the effort required is greater.

Flash is best used in an interactive way
Think carefully before using Flash for animations that are simply for people to watch.

Online is an interactive experience and people rapidly grow bored with animations that they can only watch. For any animation consider using animated gifs instead, although they may not be as small or as smooth as a Flash alternative.

Flash is best used for interactive experiences where the user can effect changes within the Flash application by selecting alternative options.

Apply application development standards
All the normal rules of application development apply when developing interactive Flash applications.

Use a consistent interface, provide contextual help, make the user's choices clear and unambiguous, ensure there is appropriate feedback when the user selects a choice through and do not display any unnecessary choices - every choice should advance the application.

Make sure it is properly usability tested on paper or digital wireframes beforehand and iteratively tested throughout development.

Game experience makes Flash designers better
This is very much my opinion. People involved with PC, console or mobile gaming have a clearer understanding of how to create interactive applications that are also fun to use.

A Flash application that is not engaging or fun will not see much use, so adding that element in the 'gameplay' is critical to ensuring use.

Those with game experience have a different take on interface design. Whereas business applications are gray, square and non-imaginative, the best Flash applications are colourful, curvy, and dynamic.

This is because they serve different purposes and people use them at a different frequency level.
Qualifier: Note that I have been a game designer, so my view is biased. I am sure there are talented Flash designers out there who do not have experience in game design (and one day I'll meet one!)

Myths busted

  • Flash is inaccessible
    This is a myth I've heard repeated many times. It's untrue - Flash is not inaccessible, it simply requires a little additional effort in the approach (as all accessibility does) and that where necessary appropriately accessible alternatives be provided, such as a HTML versions. Adobe Macromedia has a great paper on the topic of Flash accessibility.
  • Flash files are very large
    Granted, the average Flash application is indeed larger than the average HTML web page - however Flash does so much more!
    Flash was developed specifically for online delivery, as such it copes well with slower connections. It provides options for streaming, background downloading or segmenting code which work very well to reduce the amount of data required before someone can begin using a Flash application.
    I've recently seen an instance where an eLearning application offered animated lessons via DHTML (Dynamic HTML) or via Flash. The DHTML versions were 10x the size of the Flash versions and placed a much greater load on the network.
  • Flash applications cannot be indexed by search engines
    This may be true for some of the older (and less used) search engines. However the leaders, particularly Google, have been able to index and search within Flash files since 2003. Adobe Macromedia also provide an SDK for website/intranet search so you can find Flash apps within your website or intranet as well!
  • Not many people have Flash on their PCs
    It is true that Nepal and Bangladesh have low penetration rates for Flash. If you are in a country with low internet penetration or restrictive government policies it's quite likely there will not be many Flash users around.
    However across the developed Western and Eastern worlds, Flash penetration exceeds 98%.
  • Flash doesn't separate the content, presentation and business rules layers
    Actually this is an issue with inexperienced Flash designers, not Flash itself. It's very possible (and I've delivered projects in this manner) to separate these layers using XML. All of the Flash applications I produced whilst at ActewAGL used XML to feed content into the Flash presentation engine - making it simple to update text.

Boasts
Here's a couple of the Flash applications I've produced/directed in the past.

These were for edutainment purposes, but also served to support the organisation's branding and build awareness amongst future customers.

Note I'm NOT a Flash designer - these were designed by specialists, I was responsible for concept and ongoing direction.

  • Power up a rock concert - taught children about the need to use different energy sources to replace coal power.
  • Energy saving fun house - used at several major events to show children different ways to save energy and water in their homes
  • Utilities timeline - a historical timeline of the development of utilities such as telecommunications, water and power

Read full post...

Friday, June 13, 2008

W3C launches public eGovernment forum

The W3C launched a public forum last week that aims to explore how to use internet technologies to improve governance and citizen participation.

Termed the eGovernment Interest Group (eGov IG), there's an open invitation to any person or organisation interested in eGovernment to join the forum.

More information is over at http://www.w3.org/2007/eGov/IG/

The charter of the eGov IG is an interesting read.

Read full post...

Tell me the topics you'd like covered in my eMetrics presentation

I'll be speaking at Ark Group's conference Driving Interoperability and Collaboration in eGovernment in Brisbane in late August on the topic of eMetrics - using them to benchmark and drive the ongoing success of eGovernment initiatives.

If you're planning to attend this conference - or even if you're not - let me know via comments to this post the areas you'd like to see covered within the eMetrics topic and I'll endeavour to cover them in my presentation.

My presentation will be posted on my slideshare site and blog after the event.

For an extract from one of my previous conference presentations on the eMetrics topic, see my post eMetrics primer

For the full presentation I gave on web strategy recently at a conference, see my post Web Strategy in Sydney

Read full post...

Blogging guidelines

Blogging is still a new phenomenon for many people, while it has been around as an activity for thousands of years in a paper form (diaries) and public 'blogging' existed long before the internet in the form of biographies, newspaper columns and radio shows.

Given there are reportedly 112 million blogs active, and thousands of new blogs started every day, there's a very good change that there's at least a handful of people in any organisation who are actively sharing their thoughts online in a blog.

Magnify this by all the online forums, chat groups, social mediums (such as MySpace and Facebook) and I think that every organisation needs to think about having a corporate policy or at least guidelines on what their employees can say publicly online, just as they have policies for speaking to the media, customers and competitors.

These should also apply for internal blogs - which could also take the form of executive newsletters via email or intranets.

These guidelines are not to stop people from communicating online on legitimate topics, nor to force them into a narrow range of acceptable areas, they are to provide ground rules for how people are to represent the organisation and advise employees of their responsibilities.

However they also form part of the employee code of conduct and therefore before enforceable where there are persistent breaches that place the organisation or its staff and customers at risk.

In the last organisation I worked in I developed the blogging policy in co-ordination with the legal team. It wasn't particularly hard as there are many good examples of these policies online.

My current agency doesn't have explicit guidelines at this time, I've had a discussion about it with appropriate people but have not had the time to follow this up, however the APLS guidelines actually do a fairly good job in a general sense of covering the area.

I'm going to pick this up again in the next few months - given that I'm aware of at least 5 people in my agency who maintain personal blogs, we're beginning to engage officially in online forums and there are at least 50 people at work involved in online networks such as Facebook and Linkedin I can see that there is a need for more explicit guidelines for public comment in the online medium.

Here's some good examples of corporate blogging policies and structures to create them:

Read full post...

eObama - the US Presidential election goes digital

I've been watching the campaign for the Democratic nomination for the US presidency with 'shock and awe'.

This has been the first election to see social media become a significant factor in the outcome - even (in many commentators' opinions) the deciding factor.

There has been very little coverage of this in Australia and I'm not sure how aware many Australians are at the high degree of impact the online channel has had on the outcome.

However in the US and in the UK the shift in election focus from presentation to participation has been widely discussed and dissected.

Leading commentators have compared it to the shift in the 1960s when television first became a factor in US politics and Kennedy demolished Nixon in a televised debate - not because he made better points, but because he presented better on camera.

...the Obama campaign has shattered the top-down, command-and-control, broadcast-TV model that has dominated American politics since the early 1960s.

"They have taken the bottom-up campaign and absolutely perfected it," says Joe Trippi, who masterminded [Democrat candidate Howard] Dean's Internet campaign in 2004. "It's light-years ahead of where we were four years ago. They'll have 100,000 people in a state who have signed up on their Web site and put in their zip code. Now, paid organizers can get in touch with people at the precinct level and help them build the organization bottom up. That's never happened before. It never was possible before."

The Machinery of Hope - Rolling Stone Magazine (20/03/2008)

How Barack Obama won the online market
Barack Obama's staff - led by one of the founders of Facebook - developed the my.barackobama.com website before he announced his nomination. This site combined all the elements of social media, election-style.

It allowed grass-root supporters to organise local precinct and state-based support chapters, create mailing lists, develop websites, blogs and online forums.

This led to the formation of hundreds of local groups, who were able to organise and mobilise rapidly and, while organised outside the campaign machine, could be co-ordinated with it when Obama's paid campaign workers arrived in an area ahead of a vote.

The site also spearheaded the donations machine for the campaign. It allowed the creation and division of phone lists, contained pre-developed scripts for supporters (to cold call people for donations) and naturally allows people to make donations directly from the home page.

As a result Obama raised a record sum of over US$270 million in donations at last count to support his campaign,. This is roughly US$50 million more than Clinton (whose campaign now owes about US$20 million) - see Open Secrets for the details of funds raised.

Remember that when Obama announced he would run Clinton was the clear front-runner. He has come from a long way behind to take the nomination, enabled by his powerful online organisation.

So how was this all kept a secret during the campaign?

It wasn't. Below are a selection of articles dissecting Obama's online machine and, in many cases, providing details of its inner workings.


So if all of this was known - why didn't Clinton copy and improve on it?

The simple answer is that Obama's campaign was run by Digital Natives - people brought up using the internet or who understand and make use of it's amazing potential as a way to connect and empower individuals at the grassroots, organise and co-ordinate resources and create new paths to solve old problems.

Clinton's campaign staff were focused on traditional, tried-and-true command and control ways of running campaigns and simply did not have the capacity to change mindsets in time to stop the Obama juggernaut.

Traditional media is based on command and control. But the digital world is all about grassroots. Traditional media is about authority. Digital is about authenticity.

You can see it in the language they use. Obama uses the language of "we and you," which is inclusive and nods to the wisdom of the crowds. She [Clinton] uses "I and me." His stuff is about "yes, you can." Which is about the buyer. She talks about "experience from day one." That's about the seller. That doesn't resonate anymore.

Obama's Web Marketing triumph - Fortune Magazine (03/03/2008)


I wonder which politician or organisation will next be able to replicate Obama's success?

Read full post...

Bookmark and Share