Wednesday, October 15, 2008

The success of Future Melbourne - an online wiki-led consultation program

I've been looking at the success of the Future Melbourne program, a wiki and blog based approach to shaping the future urban landscape of Australia's second largest city.

The program allowed citizens to directly collaborate, edit and comment on the plans for the future development of the city. It attracted more than 30,000 visits by nearly 7,000 individuals and over 200 edits to the plans, ranging from spelling and grammatical corrections through to lengthy well-considered contributions (and not one instance of spam, off-topic or offensive content).

Reading through an offline presentation on Future Melbourne, the program involved several stages,

  • Specification and construction of the environment in collaboration with Collabforge using a free wiki tool (Twiki),
  • training of the Future Melbourne team, who moderated the wiki throughout the consultation process,
  • a preliminary closed wiki round (13 – 25 March 2008) to test the technology with stakeholders,
  • an open wiki round (17 May – 14 June 2008) allowing anyone to read or modify the Future Melbourne plan.
As part of the process appropriate Conditions of Registration, Privacy Policy & Discussion Rules were developed to cover the legal requirements of the program.

Participation Policies & Guidelines and a Netiquette guide were developed to help participants understand the framework for engagement.

The wiki was monitored on a day-by-day basis to ensure appropriate conduct was upheld and changes were tracked via the wiki system.

Some of the learnings of the program included:
  • Make it as easy as possible - even pressing 'Edit' can be a daunting proposition
  • Requires leadership and support - organisations cannot simply provide a structure, they must actively provide internal support and 'figureheads' to guide the community.
  • Change management is important - the shift to an always-on direct online consultation approach requires changes in mindset to support the speed and tone of organisational involvement in the medium.
  • Acknowledge and manage the potential risk - be aware of the potential risks (offensive material, spam, negative comments, etc), put in place appropriate policies and guidelines to enforce standards and monitor the system.
  • Keep expert advice on hand - don't rely on past experience from other consultation mediums.
  • Stay in touch with the outside world - maintain a watch on other online engagement and comments on the consultation in other online sites, try to keep the community informed and engaged throughout the process.
This is a wonderful example of a successful online consultation process in Australia.

I hope other public sector organisations are considering similar routes to engage their customers and community.

Anyone who is going down this route, I'd appreciate if you dropped me a line.

Read full post...

How can we effectively share our egovernment successes and failures?

I find egovernment an exciting area to work in.

It offers benefits to citizens and businesses in reducing the time and cost of engaging with government

It offers benefits to taxpayers due to the cost savings achievable within the public sector and the ability to improve transparency in government.

It offers benefits to individuals and communities by providing new and effective ways to collaborate with community and advocacy groups, businesses, agencies from other jurisdictions, the community and individual citizens to deliver improved policy and service outcomes.

I find that many Australian public sector organisations are engaged in exciting experiments with digital web and mobile technologies to improve their engagement and service delivery. There are also many innovative individuals working in different areas to advocate the use of modern tools to improve the solutions to age-old issues.

However finding out about these initiatives and the lessons learnt in each case isn't easy.

There are limited forums for communication between public sector organisations and the means by which we share information is often limited by funding, time and bureaucratic overheads.

In the private sector competitors often keep secrets from each other as a may to build competitive advantage. In the public sector secrets are often necessary for customer privacy or state interest, however they can also reduce our ability to provide community benefit where they cross into restrictions on learning from mistakes or successes.

Lack of information sharing also results in duplication of work, very slow learning from mistakes and redundancy - which costs government and therefore taxpayers and service recipients time and money.

I'm working through approaches to improve communication across egovernment practitioners in Australia, drawing from New Zealand's excellent wikis, the online forums used in the UK and US and the European Union's fantastic community site.

Do others have any ideas they can suggest to me to help us share our information across all levels of Australian government in an appropriate way?

Read full post...

Tuesday, October 14, 2008

588 nominations received in the UK e-Government National Awards 2008

Considering the 30-40 nominations received in Australia's annual egovernment awards, it's staggering to consider than in the UK there were over 588 initiatives to be nominated in 2008.

Judging is underway and finalists in 11 categories will be published on 7 November.

If you're seeking a source of inspiration regarding egovernment initiatives, the e-Government National Awards 2008 finalists will be certainly worth reviewing.

Read full post...

Twitter as an opinion tool - as used to follow the US election

Just as organisations are beginning to listen to the conversations about them on forums, in blogs and in online newspaper comments, Twitter has become a powerful and important mechanism for tracking US public opinion during the US Presidential election.

In a custom-built application, Twitter has used its search and trending tools to build an updating commentary on the election, visible at http://election.twitter.com.

Thinking back to the days of tickertape news releases and stock updates, this is a high-tech equivalent reflecting the views of US Twitter users.

With the integration of a mention weighting system and positive/negative indications,it would be possible for any politician or organisation to get a 24/7 view of their public sentiment.

Any sudden changes in the normal flow of comments could then be mined to detect and pre-emptively prepare for issues before they reach the broader media.

For the sceptics, who do not see Twitter as a valid channel for government communication with the public or media, here's a list of US government 'A-list' Twitterers, including the White House, Senator Obama and a selection of State Governors and large US agencies.

And for those who like poetry and the big picture, 3D Twittervision provides an interesting global insight - particularly during major crises.

Read full post...

Australia.gov.au getting kudos from US

AGIMO's Australia.gov.au portal has received kudos recently from the US's Government Technology publication in an article, Australia National Web Portal Links Citizens to Government Services.

It's good to see Australia's achievements recognised overseas and I hope to see more of this as the AGOSP initiative rolls out some impressive new functionality into the site.

I hope to see further development of their other services, such as GovDex and online consultation in coming years as well, to help the public sector to continue to reach customers in a cost-effective manner and engage them in the business of governing Australia.

Read full post...

Bookmark and Share